| Citation: |
Noel, V. A., Oulvey, E., Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., Carpenter-Song, E. A., & DeAtley, B. (2018). A preliminary evaluation of individual placement and support for youth with developmental and psychiatric disabilities.
Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 48
(2),
249-255.
|
| Title: |
A preliminary evaluation of individual placement and support for youth with developmental and psychiatric disabilities |
| Authors: |
Noel, V. A., Oulvey, E., Drake, R. E., Bond, G. R., Carpenter-Song, E. A., & DeAtley, B. |
| Year: |
2018 |
|
Journal/Publication:
|
Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation |
| Publisher: |
IOS Press |
| DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.3233/JVR-180934
|
| Full text: |
https://content.iospress.com/articles/journal-of-vocational-rehabil...
|
| Peer-reviewed? |
Yes
|
| NIDILRR-funded? |
Yes
|
| Background: |
Youth with disabilities desire competitive employment, but most are placed in sheltered workshops. Illinois launched a pilot project to promote competitive employment for youth with disabilities, using Individual Placement and Support (IPS), an evidence-based vocational model for people with serious mental illness. |
|
Purpose:
|
To evaluate the potential of IPS for youth with developmental and/or psychiatric disabilities |
|
Data collection and analysis:
|
We assessed fidelity to the IPS model, competitive employment outcomes, and implementation barriers over one year in 10 agencies in Illinois implementing new IPS programs for youth with developmental and/or psychiatric disabilities. Assessments included fidelity reviews, employment outcomes, and semi-structured interviews. Project outcomes were compared against national benchmarks for fidelity and employment outcomes. |
|
Findings:
|
All 10 programs successfully implemented IPS with four achieving a fidelity score above 100, the benchmark for good fidelity. Over a 12-month follow-up period, most programs increased quarterly employment rates, reaching a mean employment rate of 36% (SD?=?14%) by the fourth quarter, approaching the national benchmark for good employment outcome. A lack of collaboration between systems, competing expectations, and stigma were the main implementation barriers. |
|
Conclusions:
|
The overall good employment rate and fidelity scores suggest that IPS is a promising approach for youth with disabilities. |