Research Database: Article Details
| Citation: | Secker, J., & Membrey, H. (2003). Promoting mental health through employment and developing healthy workplaces: the potential of natural supports at work. Health Education Research, 18 (2), 207-215. |
| Title: | Promoting mental health through employment and developing healthy workplaces: the potential of natural supports at work |
| Authors: | Secker, J., & Membrey, H. |
| Year: | 2003 |
| Journal/Publication: | Health Education Research |
| Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
| Full text: | http://proxy.library.vcu.edu/login?url=http://her.oxfordjournals.or... | MS Word |
| Peer-reviewed? | Yes |
| NIDILRR-funded? | No |
| Research design: | Case history review |
Structured abstract:
| Background: | In England, policy developments in the field of mental health are stimulating interest in employment for mental health service users as a means of mental health promotion. To date, research that might assist in increasing employment rates amongst this group has focused largely on the question of which service users are most likely to benefit from vocational interventions and, more recently, on models of vocational support. Less is known about how employers can assist people in their transition or return to work. |
| Purpose: | This study draws on the accounts of 17 employment project clients to identify workplace factors that were associated with job retention. Specific objectives were: (1) To identify a sample of employment support service users who had retained open, competitive employment for 12 months or longer. (2) To identify a sample where employment had broken down after a period of less than 12 months employment. (3) To explore the experiences of both groups from their own perspective. (4) To explore the perspectives of the other key individuals involved, including employment project workers and workplace managers. (5) To identify factors associated with the success or breakdown of supported employment on the basis of the accounts obtained. |
| Setting: | The study was conducted at five project sites in England. Of the five projects, two were based in geographically and demographically diverse areas of outer London (Projects A and B), one operated in a semi-rural area of southeast England (Project C), and one in an urban area of the southeast (Project D). The fifth project (Project E) was based in a Midlands city. |
| Study sample: | Clients of the five projects who had current or recent experience of open employment were invited to a meeting at their project where the research and what would be involved was explained. As a result of the meetings some clients decided not to take part because they had not disclosed their mental health problems at work, while others who were currently employed had not yet been in their job for a year. These clients therefore withdrew from the study. In total, 10 male clients and seven female clients did take part. Eleven clients had been able to retain open employment for 12 months or longer, while the other six clients’ jobs had ended within 12 months for reasons they themselves saw as problematic. |
| Intervention: | Since the aim was to explore clients’ perceptions of their employment experiences, a semi-structured interview schedule was developed to enable each participant to tell the ‘story’ of the job concerned from its beginning in the assessment and preparation stage leading up to the job, through its development to its end or to the present time in the case of ongoing jobs. The schedule explored key events during each stage of the job, including clients’ first meetings with their manager and colleagues, their induction, and subsequent significant developments identified by participants themselves. Throughout the interview, participants’ feelings and attitudes, their accounts of factors which had either positive or negative effects, and their views about what else might have been helpful were explored. Questions were also included to obtain background data, including clients’ employment and mental health history. The interviews varied in length from 40 min to just over 3 h. |
| Control or comparison condition: | There was no control or comparison condition. |
| Data collection and analysis: | With participants’ permission, the interviews were tape recorded and transcribed verbatim. A staged analysis was then carried out. Initially, each job was treated as a ‘case’, and the 17 cases were divided into jobs that had been retained and jobs that had broken down. Data relating to each case (i.e. the client’s, project worker’s and manager’s accounts of a job) were then grouped under broad categories according to whether they related to employment support, workplaces or service users’ personal circumstances. Data within each category were analysed to generate subcategories within each main category, e.g. workplace factors relating to managers, colleagues and conditions of employment. These were then compared across cases in order to identify those factors that were associated with job retention and job breakdown. As noted earlier, in this article we focus on clients’ accounts of those factors relating to the workplace. |
| Findings: | Specific adjustments such as flexibility about working hours, work schedules and job tasks emerged as crucial in enabling clients to deal with the effects of medication, and to regain stamina and confidence. Over and above these, however, ‘natural supports’ of a kind from which any employee would arguably benefit were equally important. In this respect the main themes revolved around training and support to learn the job, supportive interpersonal relationships at work, workplace culture, and approaches to staff management. Themes from the findings might equally provide a productive focus for workplace health promotion more generally, using organization development approaches. |
| Conclusions: | On the basis of this study, four organizational initiatives in particular might help to ensure that workplaces are mentally healthy, both for mental health service users starting or returning to work, and for other employees: • Ensuring that a formal period of induction, of sufficient length, is routine practice for all new employees. For many jobs, induction will need to include formal training geared to the employee’s pace of learning, opportunities to observe colleagues’ work and the explicit identification of sources of support for tackling problems that arise. • Embedding attention to employees’ ongoing development in routine workplace practice through formal supervision and appraisal procedures. • Team building aimed at creating a welcoming workplace where difference is accepted and employees’ strengths are valued. • Training and other learning opportunities, e.g. action learning sets, for managers, covering mental health and safety at work, team building, and individual staff management. Opportunities to explore the boundaries between a friendly, supportive approach and ensuring that work is completed would be particularly valuable, as would training in techniques for providing constructive criticism for employees. |
| Disabilities served: |
Chronic mental illness |
| Populations served: |
Gender: Male Gender: Female |
| Interventions: |
Co-worker supports Natural supports |
| Outcomes: |
Employment acquisition |