Journal Article Details
Citation:
McGurk,S.,R., Mueser, K.,T., DeRosa,T.,J.,& Wolfe, R. (2009). Work,recovery and comorbidity in schizophrenia: A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation.
Schizophrenia Bulletin, 35
(2),
319-335.
Title:
Work,recovery and comorbidity in schizophrenia: A randomized controlled trial of cognitive remediation
Authors:
McGurk,S.,R., Mueser, K.,T., DeRosa,T.,J.,& Wolfe, R.
Year:
2009
Journal/Publication:
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Publisher:
Oxford University Press
DOI:
Full text:
Peer-reviewed?
Yes
NIDILRR-funded?
No
Research design:
Randomized controlled trial
Structured abstract:
Background:
A common theme that cuts across all definitions of recovery is work. Work is valued by most and it enables on to make a contribution to society and offers the promise of liberating consumers from financial dependence on others. In recent years, a recovery paradigm has emerged that offers a guiding vision for self-empowerment, treatment, and
rehabilitation for individuals with schizophrenia and comorbid problems such as: cognitive impairment,9 substance abuse,10
and medical disorders. This study addressed the impact
of comorbidity on recovery of work functioning and
response to vocational rehabilitation, described strategies
for minimizing its effects, and provided data from a new
study targeting the problem of cognitive impairment in
order to improve employment outcomes.
Purpose:
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the impact of adding cognitive remediation to vocational rehabilitation to determine the impact on comorbid substance abuse and medical disorders on
work outcomes and response to the treatment program.
Setting:
The study took place in a vocational rehabilitation program associated with an urban medical center.
Study sample:
The study included 34 participants who were 18 years or older, had severe mental illness, expressed an interest in work, had a history of being fired or quitting employment prior to locating new work. Participants received either vocational rehabilitation plus cognitive retraining or Vocational rehabilitation only.
In both groups, the majority of subjects were male (61% and 56%) black (61% and 63%) and had never been married (78% and 75%). The primary diagnosis was Schizophrenia (75% and 60%) and most had a comorbid disorder (67% and 81%). The mean age of the group members was (46 and 42 years).
Intervention:
The intervention was adding cognitive remediation to a hybrid vocational rehabilitation program that combined paid internship jobs with supported employment.
Control or comparison condition:
Participants were randomly assigned to either vocational rehabilitation alone or vocational rehabilitation and cognitive remediation using a computer-generated randomization program.
Data collection & analysis:
Referrals were made by therapists and work
services personnel. Those interested had a
baseline assessment scheduled.
Consumers were not paid for assessments. Following
completion of the assessments, consumers were randomized
to either vocational rehabilitation alone (VR) or vocational
rehabilitation and cognitive remediation (VR and CR)using a computer program.
The examiners compared the groups at baseline on the demographic,
clinical, and cognitive measures using t-tests
(continuous variables) and v2 analyses (categorical variables).
Next they computed the percentage of consumers
who were exposed to the cognitive remediation
program, defined as completing 6 or more cognitive remediation
sessions, the average number of sessions
completed, and the number of weeks to complete
them.
Then to evaluate changes over the treatment
period in cognitive functioning and clinical variables,
they performed a series of analyses of covariance
(ANCOVAs), with the cognitive/symptom measures at
posttreatment as the dependent variables, the cognitive/
symptom measures at baseline as the covariate,
and treatment group as the independent variable.
Finally they looked at work outcomes. Because continuous
work outcomes were highly positively skewed,
main treatment effects were evaluated by performing
Mann-Whitney U tests comparing the 2 treatment
groups on wages earned and hours and weeks worked.
To evaluate whether substance abuse directly influenced
vocational outcomes or interacted with treatment
group, separate analyses were performed for current
drug-use disorder and alcohol-use disorder. For these
analyses, the work variables were log transformed to
minimize skew. For each series of analyses, analyses
of variance were performed with current drug-use disorder
(or current alcohol-use disorder), treatment group,
and their interactions as the independent variables and
the work outcomes as the dependent variables. The main
effect for drug-use disorder (or alcohol-use disorder) in
these analyses was a test of whether the disorder had an
overall impact on vocational outcomes, whereas the
drug-use disorder (or alcohol-use disorder) by treatment
group interaction effect was a test of whether the outcomes
of the treatment groups differed significantly as a function
of the disorders.
Findings:
Statistical tests comparing consumers assigned to VR
only or VR and CR indicated no significant differences
in any demographic, diagnostic, or baseline clinical or
cognitive performance measures.
The results of the ANCOVAs comparing changes over
time in cognitive functioning and symptoms between
consumers who received cognitive remediation and those
who did not were summarized. Significant
improvements favoring cognitive remediation were
found for several cognitive measures.
Results of the Mann-Whitney U tests comparing work
outcomes for the 2 groups indicated that the VR and CR group worked significantly more internship weeks and hours and earned more
wages than the VR-only group.
The VR and CR group also worked significantly more weeks than VR only, and there was a trend for them to earn more wages, although hours
worked did not differ between the groups. Number of
weeks or hours of competitive work did not differ between
the 2 groups nor did wages earned. Overall rates of competitive
rates were 39% for the VR and CR group vs 31% for
the VR-only group, which did not differ significantly.
Analyses of relationship of substance-abuse disorder
and medical comorbidity focused on total (log transformed)
hours worked for each vocational outcome.
Alcohol-use disorder was marginally significantly related
to total hours worked withthe absence of current alcohol-use disorder associated
with more hours worked
compared with the presence of an alcohol-use disorder.
Drug-use disorder
was also related to total hours worked
, with absence of current drug-use
disorder associated with more hours worked
compared with the presence
of a drug-use disorder.
There were no interactions between either alcohol
or drug-use disorder and treatment group, suggesting
that the addition of cognitive remediation to vocational
services was just as helpful in the consumers with a substance-
use disorder as those without.
A similar analysis of total hours worked comparing
consumers with high levels of medical comorbidity to
those with low levels indicated that both the main effect
for medical comorbidity and the interaction with treatment
group were not significant. Thus, consumers with
higher medical comorbidity burden appeared to have
comparable vocational outcomes compared with those
with less such burden.
For the VR-only group, Spearman correlations between
overall cognitive performance at baseline and total work over the study
period were significant for total hours worked and wages earned and marginally
significant for number of weeks worked, whereas for the VR and CR group,
none of these correlations were significant Thus, cognitive performance at
baseline was more predictive of work in the study for those in the control group than those in the cognitive remediation group.
Conclusions:
Providing cognitive remediation in addition to vocational rehabilitation can improve cognitive functioning and employment outcomes for individuals with severe mental illness. Comorbid substance abuse impacts work outcomes while medical comorbidity does not. More research is needed to evaluate the impact of comorbidity and their interaction on treatment. More research is needed to evaluate the impact of comorbidity on work functioning in VR and its interaction with cognitive remediation.
Disabilities served:
Alcohol and drug abuse
Medical impairment
Schizophrenia
Medical impairment
Schizophrenia
Populations served:
Gender: Female and Male
Race: American Indian or Alaska Native
Race: Asian
Race: Black / African American
Ethnicity: Hispanic or Latino
Other
Race: American Indian or Alaska Native
Race: Asian
Race: Black / African American
Ethnicity: Hispanic or Latino
Other
Interventions:
Supported employment
Other
Other
Outcomes:
Employment acquisition
Return to work
Return to work